I need some owners of the various points ownerships to chime in on this. We have points ownerships through a California-based company. In the past, they have offered discounts on MFs to VIP level ownerships. Recently, they eliminated the discounts so now every owner pays exactly the same rate per point regardless of the number of points that you own, thus eliminating a big reason on having lots of points.
My understanding of some of the other points programs out there (WM, Diamond, BG) are that the more points you own, the lower your MF/point. Can someone explain the gist of that point ownership on this matter? I thought that Diamond was broken up into two components a flat rate component, applied to all ownerships + a second component that was tied to the number of points each person owns.
On our ownership, I had a chance to spend some time with the VP of owner services and was told the reason for the elimination of the discount on our program was because the CA real estate commission recently changed heads and in their review of the program, said having the two tiered MF structure was not valid and that it had to be eliminated. As a result, we got screwed. Does this sound valid?
My understanding of some of the other points programs out there (WM, Diamond, BG) are that the more points you own, the lower your MF/point. Can someone explain the gist of that point ownership on this matter? I thought that Diamond was broken up into two components a flat rate component, applied to all ownerships + a second component that was tied to the number of points each person owns.
On our ownership, I had a chance to spend some time with the VP of owner services and was told the reason for the elimination of the discount on our program was because the CA real estate commission recently changed heads and in their review of the program, said having the two tiered MF structure was not valid and that it had to be eliminated. As a result, we got screwed. Does this sound valid?
Comment