On another timeshare forum there has been considerable discussion about a certain resort that assigns all the units that exchangers get, rather than allowing the exchangers to obtain a specific unit that has been deposited. On that site some of the owners at that resort have been very vocal, to the point of being offensive, that that is their resort's right and you can head on down the road if you don't like it.
Something happened today to illustrate that the consumer has the right to know what they are getting when they make the decision to buy. Actually, had nothing out of the ordinary happened today, shouldn't the consumer have the right to know what they are getting before they buy?
Today's incident did not happen at that resort, but it did happen at another resort that assigns units, so that the consumer does not know what they are getting when they make the decision to exchange there. I posted the following on that other forum also.
All the girls in Jenny's family headed out on Aunt Jenny's Girls Week Out to the Fairfield, Nashville, an annual event. This year her 70-ish mother has had both hips replaced. She fell trying to navigate the curb at the resort's Welcome Center when they were checking in. They had to call the paramedics and do an accident report.
To add insult to injury (literally), they then found out they had been placed in a second-floor unit, despite both Jenny and me calling in advance and requesting a first-floor unit.
To add further insult, when I called for the General Manager, I was told she was in a meeting. General Managers should not be in meetings when people call to ask about an accident that just occurred on their property, if you understand what I am saying.
We have always had nothing but praise for Fairfield Nashville, and this is the first time they have let us down.
The point I'm trying to make is that if we knew the specific unit(s) we were exchanging for at the time we were faced with that decision, and we decided to take a second floor unit, then it would have our bad judgement, not the resorts.
I just spoke with a person trying to smooth things over at Fairfield Nashville, and they appear to be as accomodating as they always have been.
Something happened today to illustrate that the consumer has the right to know what they are getting when they make the decision to buy. Actually, had nothing out of the ordinary happened today, shouldn't the consumer have the right to know what they are getting before they buy?
Today's incident did not happen at that resort, but it did happen at another resort that assigns units, so that the consumer does not know what they are getting when they make the decision to exchange there. I posted the following on that other forum also.
All the girls in Jenny's family headed out on Aunt Jenny's Girls Week Out to the Fairfield, Nashville, an annual event. This year her 70-ish mother has had both hips replaced. She fell trying to navigate the curb at the resort's Welcome Center when they were checking in. They had to call the paramedics and do an accident report.
To add insult to injury (literally), they then found out they had been placed in a second-floor unit, despite both Jenny and me calling in advance and requesting a first-floor unit.
To add further insult, when I called for the General Manager, I was told she was in a meeting. General Managers should not be in meetings when people call to ask about an accident that just occurred on their property, if you understand what I am saying.
We have always had nothing but praise for Fairfield Nashville, and this is the first time they have let us down.
The point I'm trying to make is that if we knew the specific unit(s) we were exchanging for at the time we were faced with that decision, and we decided to take a second floor unit, then it would have our bad judgement, not the resorts.
I just spoke with a person trying to smooth things over at Fairfield Nashville, and they appear to be as accomodating as they always have been.
Comment