One listing I have been watching and bidding on is a resort that we own. I am very well aware that the seller is trying to underplay maintenance fees for this resort. I am surprised to see him/her quoting fees from 2006 for an even-year week. When someone asked what the fees for 2008 would be, the seller said the resort does not know. It might have been wise to quote the 2007 fees, even though it is an even-year usage, as they are $130 more than they were in 2006. I guarantee they will go up another $130 for next year, as they go up more than 10% every year, so the new buyer is going to be angry with the seller. Hopefully, the winner of the auction will call the resort and confirm the current fees.
When I let this person know the fees were incorrect and the correct amount for 2007, this is the response I received:
Hello,
We strive to gather as much accurate information as possible before putting on an ad. We acquire informaton from the prior owner & also contact the resort to receive a Estoppel Certificate which confirms that it is morgage free, what the maintenance fees are & that they are also current. The amount of the maintenance fee listed in the ad is what the resort told us. We certainly wouldn't jeopardize our credibility for a mere $127.00 So, it has nothing to do with honesty.
We also have a caveat at the bottom of the ad which states the following: You will be liable for any future fee increases or additional fees associated with this timeshare after you are the winning bidder. We have listed the known fees (at this time) associated with this timeshare but no one can guarantee future additional fees or fee increases. Feel free to contact the resort before bidding to verify all fees.
Thank you for your interest. Kind regards - Denise
See, the problem is not the $127 dollar difference from 2006, it will be the $260 from 2006 to 2008. That is a huge difference. Very deliberate. If this is a TUGger, you ought to fix the ad.
When I posted this information on TUG, another poster accused me of policing ads??? I don't do that at all. I have a very limited knowledge of what maintenance fees should be for resorts because we own a miniscule number of them and those are the ones I know. I was bidding on this one.
When I let this person know the fees were incorrect and the correct amount for 2007, this is the response I received:
Hello,
We strive to gather as much accurate information as possible before putting on an ad. We acquire informaton from the prior owner & also contact the resort to receive a Estoppel Certificate which confirms that it is morgage free, what the maintenance fees are & that they are also current. The amount of the maintenance fee listed in the ad is what the resort told us. We certainly wouldn't jeopardize our credibility for a mere $127.00 So, it has nothing to do with honesty.
We also have a caveat at the bottom of the ad which states the following: You will be liable for any future fee increases or additional fees associated with this timeshare after you are the winning bidder. We have listed the known fees (at this time) associated with this timeshare but no one can guarantee future additional fees or fee increases. Feel free to contact the resort before bidding to verify all fees.
Thank you for your interest. Kind regards - Denise
See, the problem is not the $127 dollar difference from 2006, it will be the $260 from 2006 to 2008. That is a huge difference. Very deliberate. If this is a TUGger, you ought to fix the ad.
When I posted this information on TUG, another poster accused me of policing ads??? I don't do that at all. I have a very limited knowledge of what maintenance fees should be for resorts because we own a miniscule number of them and those are the ones I know. I was bidding on this one.
Comment