Tweet
Originally posted by BocaBum99
-
I would say that most people on this site are realistic about timeshare rather than simply positive. How many times have we seen established members warning newbies about the potential risks of timeshare purchase? -
Originally posted by Keitht
Or become disenchanted with some aspect of timesharing say like.........RCI weeks.
It's not all positive here or OY and everyone's not wearing rose colored glasses on either site. Realistic is a better term.Our timeshare and other photo's at http://dougp26364.smugmug.com/Comment
-
There is a small group of people on this site - and, yes the groupthink expression that was mentioned may apply - who seem to equate the vision of the recently sacked Ken May at RCI with timesharing as a whole and thus believe that if you are negative toward May's legacy at RCI then you automatically are negative toward timesharing as a whole. If you are positive toward DAE, II, HTSE, and any number of other timeshare organizations, positive toward our homeowner-controlled HOA's, and positive toward many other aspects of timesharing, it doesn't matter to this group unless you also worship RCI Points, rentals, and all the other stuff May introduced at RCI.
Horsehockey!
Timesharing would have been a heck of a lot better off if Ken May, the Darth Vader of timesharing, had been sacked after 8 days at RCI, instead of waiting 8 long years. While this group would probably like to cannonize May, what he did to timesharing would indicate that it would be more appropriate to have him drawn and quartered.
This group needs to get real. There are other opinions on timesharing than just theirs, and disagreeing with their worship of Ken May's changes at RCI does NOT equate with being negative toward timesharing as a whole.Comment
-
A realist recognizes both the positive and negative in life, and for that matter in timesharing.
A ''happy'' wants to keep his head in the ground and not realize that some things are not hunky-dory. Perhaps the happys should all go play bumble-puppy (if you have forgotten that, go back and read Huxley's Brave New World) instead of posting on timeshare sites.
Crimeshare does allow all sides of issues to be heard, and clearly that offends people who want to close their ears to some information and views.Comment
-
I'm glad it's back.Comment
-
. . . so, it seems, is virtually everyone who has posted on the thread on Crimeshare at UK-based Timeshare Talk.Originally posted by 1950bing
It is very curious to me that Crimeshare focuses largely on Europe, and European timesharers seem to appreciate it being out there, yet a small but vocal group on this US-based site, which probably rarely reads it, is slamming it! Could it be a knee-jerk reaction to anyone who questions such things as points or the high-and-mighty RCI?Comment
-
Sounds like something Joseph Goebbels would have written.Originally posted by BocaBum99
A world without pros and cons would be a very boring place where freedom could not be found.Comment
-
Imagine a world where Godwin's Law wasn't?Originally posted by tonygSounds like something Joseph Goebbels would have written.
A world without pros and cons would be a very boring place where freedom could not be found.“Maybe you shouldn't dress like that.”
“This is a blouse and skirt. I don't know what you're talking about.”
“You shouldn't wear that body.”Comment
-
Pre-1930's ?Comment
Comment