Originally posted by radiobb
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Disgruntled BlueGreen Owner
Collapse
X
-
-
Originally posted by radiobb View PostThanks for the responses everyone. I think it's time to move on to make the most of what I have. Actually, we have had 3 nice vacations and one that wasn't so nice (just because they put us in an older room at one of the resorts).
I'll check out the other links and see how to do better. With only 9000 points, I've decided it doesn't make a lot of sense for me to use them at spring break- I can't stay in Florida for a whole week on 9000. Better to use them on hot weeks or white weeks on the calendar.
I was thinking I could buy more cheap points from a reseller and book vacations for my friends and parents. That might pay for my maintenance fees.
How do I get value out of Traveler's Plus? Is there a forum for that?
If you buy cheap points just make sure they are in the same trust that you already own. If not, your maintenance fees could be several hundred higher than they should be.
Comment
-
Originally posted by radiobb View PostMy wife and I bought 9000 points thinking it would be a good deal. About 3 years ago, it cost us $17000. We figured if we kept it a long time, we were going to spend the money anyway. However, I didn't count on maintenance fees and dues being $850 per year. Anyway, it's water under the bridge and I chalk it up to a bad decision.
Anyway, now that we're in, it looks like there's no way out. I can afford the fees, but some day I'd really like my money back. From what I've read, it looks like it's not possible to cancel or sell, except at a very low price. Once you're in, you're stuck. Am I missing anything?
Comment
-
Originally posted by ROGKAR View PostIt still surprises me that anyone would buy a timeshare at such a high price when they are giving them away on e-bay and others like me trying not to pay to give them away! I have a Bluegreen 2 BDRM Villa at Christmas Mt. in the WI Dells and no one wants it!
We bought resale, but we're the "learn by research" type. Most people seem to be the "learn by doing" type, and if you're that kind of personality, timeshares can teach a harsh lesson. But, for some people, it ends up being a good lesson - they learn both to not rush into a "now or never" kind of deal, AND how to make the best of something that wasn't exactly what it expected. Not always possible, but a good thing when it happens.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HobbitessIf you can't sell the timeshare it'd be worth something? How does that work?
it might stop the bottom falling out of the market.
But hey as long as they get the MF every year does it matter ?
Comment
-
I'm afraid you may not have actually thought that one all the way through!
Originally posted by stevec View PostThey should kill the resale market
Then the timeshare would be worth somethingmy travel website: Vacation-Times.org.
"A vacation is what you take when you can no longer take what you’ve been taking."
~Earl Wilson
Comment
-
Originally posted by stevec View PostIf Bluegreen bought back or the only option to get into the resorts was to buy from them or maybe licenced resellers.
it might stop the bottom falling out of the market.
Do you also expect the banks who gave out loans to people before the bubble burst to buy back the houses at the same price if people want to bail? Do you buy your cars new, and does it bother you that just driving it off the lot it drops in value by thousands or tens of thousands of dollars? Why should Timeshares be the only market where signing a contract saying you'll purchase something means nothing?
Many resort systems do limit perks to those who buy from them direct, which I see as a reasonable response to the fact that resales cost less than buying from the developer.
Comment
-
Originally posted by HobbitessDid you buy it resale? If not, why does it surprise you people pay such a high price when they're giving them away?
We bought resale, but we're the "learn by research" type. Most people seem to be the "learn by doing" type, and if you're that kind of personality, timeshares can teach a harsh lesson. But, for some people, it ends up being a good lesson - they learn both to not rush into a "now or never" kind of deal, AND how to make the best of something that wasn't exactly what it expected. Not always possible, but a good thing when it happens.
Comment
-
Originally posted by stevec View PostI thought it through a lot it was meant to promote some discussionOriginally posted by stevec View PostIf Bluegreen bought back or the only option to get into the resorts was to buy from them or maybe licenced resellers.
And by allowing owners to rent out their points, Bluegreen gives all owners the opportunity to recoup part or all of their yearly fees - but of course that means that there are non-owners at the resort.
I'm not sure how it works with weeks systems, but with points systems like Bluegreen or DVC, a fair portion of what new owners pay is plowed back into the system so that the points owners have more and more resorts to pick from. Buying back from owners means that much less money for expanding, which means more unhappy owners who've been faithfully honoring their contracts.
And the thing is, resale Timeshares are NEVER going to be the same price as TSs you buy from the developer, for one simple reason - the developer offers loans. Any time loans enter the picture, prices get inflated (witness the recent real estate balloon). I'm sure that's one of the reasons new cars lose value the instant they're driven off the lot - the car dealer can get you signed up for a loan a lot easier than an individual trying to sell their car.
Bluegreen has rearranged things a couple of times in an effort to be fair to everyone. For some time, if you bought a resale BG contract, you got all the benefits of buying from BG direct. This was good for people who were trying to sell their BG points - kept the price up, although it was still thousands less than buying direct - but many people who bought at full price thought it was unfair ("Why do they get the same thing for so much less money?"), and so did BG salespeople ("How can I feel right selling this package when I know people can get the same thing for so much less?").
So a while back (2006? 2008?), Bluegreen changed the rules. People who already had full benefits through buying resale were "grandfathered in," meaning no one lost anything they already had, but from that date on, if you bought resale points, they didn't come with the same benefits package. But they also offered the option of buying resale points through their resale company and getting the benefits by paying BG direct (in other words, you'd pay the seller for his points, and BG for the perks). So people could still get all the benefits cheaply, just not AS cheaply.
This year, they changed the rules again (but didn't take anything away from people who bought the points before their deadline), so now the best deal you can get from their resale company is the same price for points as the best deal you can get from the developer. Which they felt is fairer to the people who bought full price and to the BG salespeople.
Personally, I don't think there's any solution everyone will see as "fair." Salespeople - and not just Timeshare salespeople - have a bad reputation because people buy emotionally rather than rationally, and any good salesperson is going to instinctively work toward creating positive emotional feelings toward their product. Our salesguy was totally successful on that front - we loved the idea of Bluegreen. We just weren't enthused with the price.
And most customers who haven't over-extended themselves retain those positive vibes, which (if psychological studies can be trusted) enhance their vacations and it's a win-win situation all around. But when people make that emotional purchase against the hard realities of their life -- which is to say, contrary to their actual finances or vacation preferences -- doesn't work out so well.
Well, that was quite a ramble.
Comment
-
My gripe,
Originally posted by Hobbitess View PostWho is going to pay maintenance fees on the unsold units if only owners are allowed to use the resort? Current Bluegreen either rents the units out to non-owners, or makes them available to owners through Bonus Time, to pay the maintenance on those units. Can you imagine how high maintenance fees would be if owners had to pay to maintain ALL the units, not just the ones that have sold?
And by allowing owners to rent out their points, Bluegreen gives all owners the opportunity to recoup part or all of their yearly fees - but of course that means that there are non-owners at the resort.
I'm not sure how it works with weeks systems, but with points systems like Bluegreen or DVC, a fair portion of what new owners pay is plowed back into the system so that the points owners have more and more resorts to pick from. Buying back from owners means that much less money for expanding, which means more unhappy owners who've been faithfully honoring their contracts.
And the thing is, resale Timeshares are NEVER going to be the same price as TSs you buy from the developer, for one simple reason - the developer offers loans. Any time loans enter the picture, prices get inflated (witness the recent real estate balloon). I'm sure that's one of the reasons new cars lose value the instant they're driven off the lot - the car dealer can get you signed up for a loan a lot easier than an individual trying to sell their car.
Bluegreen has rearranged things a couple of times in an effort to be fair to everyone. For some time, if you bought a resale BG contract, you got all the benefits of buying from BG direct. This was good for people who were trying to sell their BG points - kept the price up, although it was still thousands less than buying direct - but many people who bought at full price thought it was unfair ("Why do they get the same thing for so much less money?"), and so did BG salespeople ("How can I feel right selling this package when I know people can get the same thing for so much less?").
So a while back (2006? 2008?), Bluegreen changed the rules. People who already had full benefits through buying resale were "grandfathered in," meaning no one lost anything they already had, but from that date on, if you bought resale points, they didn't come with the same benefits package. But they also offered the option of buying resale points through their resale company and getting the benefits by paying BG direct (in other words, you'd pay the seller for his points, and BG for the perks). So people could still get all the benefits cheaply, just not AS cheaply.
This year, they changed the rules again (but didn't take anything away from people who bought the points before their deadline), so now the best deal you can get from their resale company is the same price for points as the best deal you can get from the developer. Which they felt is fairer to the people who bought full price and to the BG salespeople.
Personally, I don't think there's any solution everyone will see as "fair." Salespeople - and not just Timeshare salespeople - have a bad reputation because people buy emotionally rather than rationally, and any good salesperson is going to instinctively work toward creating positive emotional feelings toward their product. Our salesguy was totally successful on that front - we loved the idea of Bluegreen. We just weren't enthused with the price.
And most customers who haven't over-extended themselves retain those positive vibes, which (if psychological studies can be trusted) enhance their vacations and it's a win-win situation all around. But when people make that emotional purchase against the hard realities of their life -- which is to say, contrary to their actual finances or vacation preferences -- doesn't work out so well.
Well, that was quite a ramble.
Comment
-
Look I don’t have a problem with paying maintenance.
But I don’t own the whole resort so why do I feel I am paying for all of it.
Why cant BG shut ,mothball, whatever, excess property and put things back in to balance ?.
Removing the over supply would benefit all.
Sure it would probably mean laying some staff off but that happens in a downturn.
Seems at the moment the answer is lets just screw the owners who are paying and carry on regardless.
Comment
Comment