There is one aspect of supply and demand that may be influencing some of these numbers.
In the old system, one got more trading power to deposit more than a year out. That incentive no longer exists in the Brave New World of Points Lite at least in what is presented as readily visible to the member. Now there is no incentive to deposit more than 6 months out. Depositing over a year out usually requires things like paying a m/f early which can be a bit of a pain. Now, with RCI removing the incentive, I suspect that there are fewer of the longer range deposits. The limited test I have done does not show RCI giving more points lite buried in their system to these long range deposits, either.
Meanwhile, many longtime members have gotten into the habit of exchanging at a long time range. For many, exchanging over 6 months out is a real necessity to make use of their ff miles, or they want maximum flexibility to get the best airfares. So the demand for longer term exchanges is still there, but the supply has likely gone down due to RCI's changes in the system.
Whether RCI caused this by outright gouging or by screwing up the system for time of deposit, the blame is still with RCI. Indeed, I suspect it is a bit of both. However, until we get FULL TRANSPARENCY, including transparency of how they compile their numbers racket, we will not know for sure. One thing for certain is that the half-way transparency of Points Lite is the worst of both worlds.
In a fair and honest system, what is sauce for the goose ought to be sauce for the gander. Those depositing weeks more than a year out ought to get more points lite for their deposits to correspond with the higher points lite that RCI is charging for exchanging into those weeks. They do not seem to be. Just one more bit of rot in what is becoming a more and more corrupt exchange system.
In the old system, one got more trading power to deposit more than a year out. That incentive no longer exists in the Brave New World of Points Lite at least in what is presented as readily visible to the member. Now there is no incentive to deposit more than 6 months out. Depositing over a year out usually requires things like paying a m/f early which can be a bit of a pain. Now, with RCI removing the incentive, I suspect that there are fewer of the longer range deposits. The limited test I have done does not show RCI giving more points lite buried in their system to these long range deposits, either.
Meanwhile, many longtime members have gotten into the habit of exchanging at a long time range. For many, exchanging over 6 months out is a real necessity to make use of their ff miles, or they want maximum flexibility to get the best airfares. So the demand for longer term exchanges is still there, but the supply has likely gone down due to RCI's changes in the system.
Whether RCI caused this by outright gouging or by screwing up the system for time of deposit, the blame is still with RCI. Indeed, I suspect it is a bit of both. However, until we get FULL TRANSPARENCY, including transparency of how they compile their numbers racket, we will not know for sure. One thing for certain is that the half-way transparency of Points Lite is the worst of both worlds.
In a fair and honest system, what is sauce for the goose ought to be sauce for the gander. Those depositing weeks more than a year out ought to get more points lite for their deposits to correspond with the higher points lite that RCI is charging for exchanging into those weeks. They do not seem to be. Just one more bit of rot in what is becoming a more and more corrupt exchange system.
Comment