Just sent to a friend at RCI:
A thought, a variation on the Partial Guest Pass, where non-members can access RCI benefits via a member.
How about a variation, where members can access (utilize) non-members' ownership?
Although I understand reasons why RCI would not be in favor of it, I can see benefits in allowing RCI members to deposit non-member inventory at RCI-affiliates. Paramount, non-members, perhaps who have been turned off by RCI in the past, would see that RCI members are benefitting from the non-members' owned weeks.
As an example, at (some resorts), (some) units are owned by people living in the area, so that they can have access to amenities at (the resorts) year-round. There's no telling how many of these people I personally know, say 30-50 families locally.
I know many of them do absolutely nothing with their timeshare, they just hold them and pay the maintenance fee each year. Some of them misunderstand how RCI works, gave up on RCI early on, and have not tried again.
If an RCI member was able to deposit weeks owned by non-members, and compensate them, they would see otherwise, and perhaps join RCI. Or, for a trial period, if they could deposit their weeks in an RCI member's account in conjunction wth the RCI Guest Pass, and make exchanges with them, they may join RCI. Granted, they would be getting full RCI benefits without joining, but it would be for a limited time, and with the RCI Guest Pass fee being paid.
A result would be that RCI could increase the inventory available to other members, and reduce the number of units that sit empty. Everyone could benefit.
In a time that has to be tough on timesharing, it may be worth looking into.
A thought, a variation on the Partial Guest Pass, where non-members can access RCI benefits via a member.
How about a variation, where members can access (utilize) non-members' ownership?
Although I understand reasons why RCI would not be in favor of it, I can see benefits in allowing RCI members to deposit non-member inventory at RCI-affiliates. Paramount, non-members, perhaps who have been turned off by RCI in the past, would see that RCI members are benefitting from the non-members' owned weeks.
As an example, at (some resorts), (some) units are owned by people living in the area, so that they can have access to amenities at (the resorts) year-round. There's no telling how many of these people I personally know, say 30-50 families locally.
I know many of them do absolutely nothing with their timeshare, they just hold them and pay the maintenance fee each year. Some of them misunderstand how RCI works, gave up on RCI early on, and have not tried again.
If an RCI member was able to deposit weeks owned by non-members, and compensate them, they would see otherwise, and perhaps join RCI. Or, for a trial period, if they could deposit their weeks in an RCI member's account in conjunction wth the RCI Guest Pass, and make exchanges with them, they may join RCI. Granted, they would be getting full RCI benefits without joining, but it would be for a limited time, and with the RCI Guest Pass fee being paid.
A result would be that RCI could increase the inventory available to other members, and reduce the number of units that sit empty. Everyone could benefit.
In a time that has to be tough on timesharing, it may be worth looking into.
Comment