I've been watching for Bonnet Creek to open up for next May almost daily for a good while. Now I can't see the resort at all. It seems to have disappeared along with nearly 20K others against my two better deposits. I'm also seeing an extremely high percentage of studios and 1BR when all my deposits are 2BR.
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
RCI's upgrade - Day 8
Collapse
X
-
Day 10
granted I am searching weeks with points so I wouldn't "see" the points resorts but...
I searched all summer 2010 and LM for SE VA Beach to Myrtle Beach + WBurg and this is all I come up with:
The Historic Powhatan Resort (#1046)
Williamsburg, VA, USA
RCI Points Range: 40,000
Available Unit Size: 2 - 2
Check-in Date Range: 8/28/10
Map it
%26i_resort_id%3D1046%26searchSource%3Dnull%26sear chResults%3Dnull%26resortid%3Dnull%26checkInDt%3Dn ull%26count%3Dnull%26veflag%3Dnull
http://www.rci.com/RCI/RCIW/RCIW_ind...6veflag%3Dnull
King's Creek Plantation (#5246)
Williamsburg, VA, USA
RCI Points Range: 33,500
Available Unit Size: 1 - 1
Check-in Date Range: 6/27/10 - 8/28/10
Map it
%26i_resort_id%3D5246%26searchSource%3Dnull%26sear chResults%3Dnull%26resortid%3Dnull%26checkInDt%3Dn ull%26count%3Dnull%26veflag%3Dnull
http://www.rci.com/RCI/RCIW/RCIW_ind...6veflag%3Dnull
Riptide Beach Club (#0400)
Myrtle Beach, SC, USA
RCI Points Range: 27,000
Available Unit Size: 1 - 1
Check-in Date Range: 8/14/10
Map it
%26i_resort_id%3D0400%26searchSource%3Dnull%26sear chResults%3Dnull%26resortid%3Dnull%26checkInDt%3Dn ull%26count%3Dnull%26veflag%3Dnull
http://www.rci.com/RCI/RCIW/RCIW_ind...6veflag%3Dnull
Barclay Towers (#1407)
Virginia Beach, VA, USA
RCI Points Range: 27,000
Available Unit Size: 1 - 1
Check-in Date Range: 8/28/10
SNAFU for Day 10 as well.Lawren
------------------------
There are many wonderful places in the world, but one of my favourite places is on the back of my horse.
- Rolf Kopfle
Comment
-
I've got a theory. I'm going to let it simmer a little more, but the short version is that trade power really has changed. It looks to me as though what used to be about 5-6 very discrete levels of trade power has changed into a much larger number of much more fine-grained trade power levels. My evidence for this: I had two weeks on deposit that were both tigers, and traded exactly the same. Now, they are very slightly different---they differ by less than 1% of total units---but one is consistently just a little better than the other. RCI feedback email has confirmed that my units are in fact now different in trade power, and they are supposed to be.
So, what does that mean? Why is all the "good stuff" gone? I don't think it is so much that all the tigers dropped (though some probably did a little bit because I know that at least one of mine did), but that many other deposits also moved up a little bit, and that sea change snapped up a lot of weeks all at once in pending ongoing searches and people who could suddenly book things they couldn't previously book.
So far, this theory seems to fit the evidence we have. It seems to explain a lot of things---the fact that all of the "tiger" deposits saw units drop by at least 10K over the course of just a few days, and that none of us can find any of the "good stuff" that used to be there.
There are two competing theories I can come up with, but they don't fit the evidence as well. One competing theory is that they all went to rentals. But. I don't think we've seen them---there are no 2010 DVC weeks for rent, for example, and there were probably 30-40 2010 weeks before the Big Change that have since just disappeared.
The other competing theory is that trade power of the "good stuff" went so high that no one can see them. But, if that were true, then *someone* would be able to see them, because *someone* has to have "good stuff" on deposit. Furthermore, Points-side searches see less than "they should" as well---which means that those weeks just aren't there, becuase Points sees everything at a non-Points resot in the next 10 months.
I'll know more when the next DVC deposit comes in. Should be sometime this week, though I'm out of town on Thursday and Friday, so I might need a hand there.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bnoble View PostI've got a theory. I'm going to let it simmer a little more, but the short version is that trade power really has changed. It looks to me as though what used to be about 5-6 very discrete levels of trade power has changed into a much larger number of much more fine-grained trade power levels. My evidence for this: I had two weeks on deposit that were both tigers, and traded exactly the same. Now, they are very slightly different---they differ by less than 1% of total units---but one is consistently just a little better than the other. RCI feedback email has confirmed that my units are in fact now different in trade power, and they are supposed to be.
So, what does that mean? Why is all the "good stuff" gone? I don't think it is so much that all the tigers dropped (though some probably did a little bit because I know that at least one of mine did), but that many other deposits also moved up a little bit, and that sea change snapped up a lot of weeks all at once in pending ongoing searches and people who could suddenly book things they couldn't previously book.
So far, this theory seems to fit the evidence we have. It seems to explain a lot of things---the fact that all of the "tiger" deposits saw units drop by at least 10K over the course of just a few days, and that none of us can find any of the "good stuff" that used to be there.
There are two competing theories I can come up with, but they don't fit the evidence as well. One competing theory is that they all went to rentals. But. I don't think we've seen them---there are no 2010 DVC weeks for rent, for example, and there were probably 30-40 2010 weeks before the Big Change that have since just disappeared.
The other competing theory is that trade power of the "good stuff" went so high that no one can see them. But, if that were true, then *someone* would be able to see them, because *someone* has to have "good stuff" on deposit. Furthermore, Points-side searches see less than "they should" as well---which means that those weeks just aren't there, becuase Points sees everything at a non-Points resot in the next 10 months.
I'll know more when the next DVC deposit comes in. Should be sometime this week, though I'm out of town on Thursday and Friday, so I might need a hand there.
I have been looking from Points at weeks just to see if my tiger got blown up or to see really what doesn't exist in the system. Plus even though more cumbersome has been faster and more stable for me the last 10 days.Lawren
------------------------
There are many wonderful places in the world, but one of my favourite places is on the back of my horse.
- Rolf Kopfle
Comment
-
Originally posted by bnoble View PostI've got a theory. I'm going to let it simmer a little more, but the short version is that trade power really has changed. It looks to me as though what used to be about 5-6 very discrete levels of trade power has changed into a much larger number of much more fine-grained trade power levels. My evidence for this: I had two weeks on deposit that were both tigers, and traded exactly the same. Now, they are very slightly different---they differ by less than 1% of total units---but one is consistently just a little better than the other. RCI feedback email has confirmed that my units are in fact now different in trade power, and they are supposed to be.
1. Something is really messed up, whereby only one date or one unit or one unit per size is showing up, when there are really multiple units and dates avail. Apparently some of their ongoing searches have this error too. I'm hoping this is soon fixed.
2. Something else is now accurate. Trade power used to really vary a lot more than 6 levels, and we know this to be fact from old TUG trade tests. When RCI went live with their new website, trade power was newly simplified to way fewer levels. Perhaps they are now restoring it to the variations it was supposed to have, and always did have, until that unveiling. So yes, trade power was set at deposit, but for awhile their computer system and website wasn't accurately reflecting that. ie trade power hasn't exactly changed - in their minds they have "corrected" an error.
3. They really have permanently removed more exchange inventory into rental-land.
Comment
-
This is going to sound like a dumb question, but here goes anyway.
How come you are expecting to see alot of options for 2010 when most people have not even paid their maintenance fees yet and have yet to deposit their weeks? I know I have not paid my maintenance fees for 2010 on any of my 5 weeks so why do you guys expect to see alot of options so early? Is this bulk deposits that you are trying to see? Just curious because I'm clueless on this stuff still. As a matter of fact I just deposited a week into points yesterday because I was leary of doing it earlier with all the computer problems but got cheated out of 10,000 points because I waited so long to deposit.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bnoble View PostIn part, the expectation is based on history. But, RCI gives the most 'credit' for a deposit a full 12 months prior to use. You can deposit as early as two years prior to use, and some people/resorts do.
Comment
-
Originally posted by bnobleCall your resort's management company, and tell them you want to pay early to deposit. Mine has me pay the prior year's fee, and then sends me the bill for the difference after that year's budget has been established.
Comment
-
My available units seem to be increasing ever so slowly, but I still can't see Bonnet Creek at all I think I can see every other Wyndham on the planet, but not this one. I'm also seeing the HGVC Orlando properties, so I don't understand why no BC. It's not like it's a tiny resort with limited availability.
Comment
-
CMV white weeks got a 25k boost
I hadn't tried any searches until yesterday, when I saw that my two CMV Timbers white weeks (week 39, deposited 7 months out) went from pulling about 100k pre-"enhancement" to pulling about 125k. So, not tigers, but certainly a move up from mediocre to decent.
I'll do a comparison at some specific resorts/areas to points and see what it is they're missing.
sc
--"Because there is good, and there is evil, and evil must be punished. Even in the face of Armageddon I shall not compromise in this."-- Rorschach, Watchmen
Comment
-
I always pay my maintenance fees 2 years out. I have floating time, and I want to get the most popular date when it is available. That day usually is gone by the end of the day that it is available to book, 2 years out. AS far as paying so early, I only pay maintenance fees once a year, but they are for 2 years ahead.Ann-Marie
Comment
Comment