Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Well, This is a Fine Kettle of Fish - Festiva takes over Escape! Resorts

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Originally posted by ace2000 View Post
    Thanks for the update, very informative. To either of you, when was the assessment? I don't recall hearing about that. Also, are you both saying that the Villas are the ones for potential RCI points, whereas the rest of the old Escapes timeshares are now under Festiva? If true, that seems like kind of an odd arrangement.
    The special assessment was approved by the Board of Directors on 19 May 2012, and mailed to owners in June 2012. It was $728, unless paid by a specific date, then it was $692. I paid $1384, in addition to the regular maintenance fees, to help finance repairs and updates to the units that were deemed necessary, in addition to the routine maintenance and updates projected and assessed.

    As for which units are going to be offered as RCI Points units, I would have no way of knowing. The entire former Escapes timeshares are an odd arrangement, to say the least though. To understand why its so odd would take a lot of behind-the-scenes access I don't have. Escapes! had timeshare units at Stonebridge and Branson Yacht Club, both in MO; Hot Springs, Bella Vista, and Cherokee Village, all in AR; Panama City Beach and Orange Beach, both in FL, and Galveston, TX.

    Let me offer my personal opinion of what makes Stonebridge so complicated. As the timeshare system evolved over the years, what started out as being sold as a deeded week, moved to being sold as a point system. It allowed for more flexible access for owners and an additional selling point to generate money for the developers. The problem is, once someone has a deeded ownership, that is their property, and their week can't be used in the point system open to anyone. For the point system to work, it needs to have good availability to the point system owners, or complaints begin to surface, and lawsuits begin.

    Escapes' resorts were initially deeded, then later some remaining units were marketed as point units. Separate inventory exists for both areas. As a float owner at Stonebridge, as an example, my week may be used during any week that has an opening anytime during the year. If I don't want to go to Stonebridge this year, I can pay an $80 internal exchange fee and go to the Yacht Club, Hot Springs, Bella Vista or Orange Beach, or I can have my week banked into RCI as an RCI exchange. Float weeks were sold by a color system that limited the time that inventory would be available for use. Red allows access the entire year, the other two colors had time restricted access.

    Fixed week owners and float week owners are in a separate system, with separate inventory and availability, then point owners. Point week owners are in a system called the Escapes Travel Club, or ETC. Units that were sold at many of the resorts were sold as club memberships with the ETC. You were sold a week/unit, but unlike normal, it was for inventory purposes only. What you bought in reality was a specific number of points that could be used at most, but not all, Escapes resorts, again based on inventory/availability.

    Because of the separate inventory control, its possible to have no availability of the week you want, when there are obviously unoccupied units all over the property. When point systems begin, there is normally contact with deeded week owners to try to get them to convert their ownership from deeded to point based. That allows the point system to add the unit/week to its inventory available to all point members, otherwise your week/unit will never be available to anyone but you. If you aren't locked in to a specific week in your personal travel plans, it may be an attractive offer to go for Christmas this year, your anniversary next, your birthday the next, etc. The problem is, the developer/whoever in charge, wants to make additional money and tries to get you to pay additional money to join the new system. Some people see it as paying more money for what you already own and someone else wants.

    It all became way too complicated along the way. Escapes built a really nice, new beachfront resort, Escapes! to the Shores, in Orange Beach, AL., on land where a hurricane had destroyed an existing timeshare. They bought the land, built a really nice ocean front property, included several timeshare units per agreement with the previous land owner and made the rest of the building regular condos. Then the bubble burst and the condo units couldn't be sold at the estimated price, or even close to the estimated price, and money went tight for the entire system. Maintenance that wasn't absolutely required was ignored, updates of any kind, few if any, not just at the Shores, but across the entire spectrum of resorts. Bills were not paid in a timely fashion. Lawsuits between the POAs and HOAs and COAs were initiated. Suits were directed to arbitration. The Attorney Generals of several states chimed in. Time was running out. The decision to drop the timeshare units was made by Coopershare/Escapes, but the system was so convoluted and tied up at that point, not much was going to be straight forward fashion. Or as you phrases it, an odd arrangement.

    The only Escape resorts it seems that anyone wanted were three of the four beach resorts. Panama City, Galveston and the Shores in Orange Beach. The PCB and Galveston resorts were the first to be sold, to Holiday Inn Club Vacation. The unit owners were given the opportunity to keep their existing weeks/points, or pay a reasonable $100 fee to drop their current ownership by joining HICV.

    Festiva wanted ownership of the Shores, but to get it, Escapes packaged their point system, the ETC, along with it. Festiva already owned several resorts in the Branson area and was seemingly hesitant to gather more inventory than they already had in the area. Did they really want Stonebridge and the Yacht Club's point units? The only way to get the Shores meant they were forced to take it.

    So, there are an odd assortment of ownership interest in controlling Stonebridge. I had heard a rumor from one of the resort managers that the reason Stonebridge didn't fall more in line with the original sell plan was that one of the guys in Escapes' management moved to Stonebridge and was doing essentially a hostile takeover of the property. If that was really the case, I imagine there would be a lot of stalling of information flow, sort of what seems to be going on now. Still, it was a rumor, and it could be innocuous in that with such an odd ownership, and all the on-going lawsuits, arbitration, and negotiations with the various exchange companies, RCI, RTX, II, its too complicated to really explain everything that likely changes monthly. If RCI had dropped Stonebridge's gold rating, during the negations that were ongoing, the value of the property likely would also have dropped. Hence the special assessment.

    To give all Escapes owners a single phone number to call for customer service seemed to be an effort that was being made by Festiva to simplify all the complications of who calls who to make a reservation. I've noticed that things are not always what they seem in the timeshare world and someone apparently decided that simple effort wasn't the right thing for them and changed the phone numbers to make reservations, and changed the name of the resort. Likely as a way of distancing the resort from the ongoing lawsuit against Coopershare., Escapes!, Inc., Escapes Travel Choices, LLC., and Festiva in all its many facets.



    Originally posted by JLB View Post
    Thanks for the accurate and real-world assessment. Sometimes that's hard to come by when you're hanging with folks still in Timeshare La La Land.

    I'm curious as to how you found this site, and thread, since your only two posts are here.

    Did you use a search engine? Maybe looking for Fine or Kettle or Fish?

    In case you did not read this entire thread, you are among the few who will understand the jist of it, which is that along the line way back when Deeded Weeks owners were converted to floating and/or ETC Points, so that in the 600# units more than one class of owners exists. Those who don't understand that, would not understand the confusion caused when you are on the practice tee or get paired up with other Villas owners in a different class, they insisting they are members of Festiva, and you wondering where they're coming up with that. But, all owners, including us with plain Jane deeded weeks are getting all the Festiva emails, too.

    &, yes, Escapes! was a much-admired and ballyhooed mini-system, another warning that should be heeded.
    I stumbled into this using Google searching for Escapes and Festiva combined as a search term. Lots of names and lots of conflicting interest abound. Lots of complications, even more than what system someone is identified with in a conversation on a golf course. Its a strange system that is best thought of in what you have written on your deed seems to be the only thing you really have. When some float owners went to sell their units, they were told that float usage was a courtesy only, that the underlying week was really what you own and you couldn't sell it any other way. In spite of what you were told when you bought in, in spite of all the years of usage, what isn't deeded, isn't enforceable. I suspect the golf club usage might fall under the same system if someone pushed it. If it wasn't deeded in the recorded deed, you may not be allowed to transfer it to anyone else. Time will tell. Hopefully, honesty will prevail.

    Comment


    • There you go.

      More kettle.

      More fishy.

      Amenity rights are in the Covenants of the 600# units, but who's counting, and in timesharing I'm sure whatever has been done can be undone.

      But, at LedgeStone, that is as undo-able as anything I've ever seen. Around here it is almost as sacred as white, Republican and over 65.

      It's strange that even as LedgeStone has been doing well, even during the recession, and it being the best gated community in the area, and with LedgeStone rated in the Top 5 Courses You Can Play in Missouri, that you can't even give away a week that includes year-round amenities.
      RCI Member Since 24-Aug-1989/150-plus Exchanges***THE TIMESHARE GRIM REAPER~~~Exchanging/Searching/SW Florida/MO/AR/IA/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living/Retirement****Sometimes ya just gotta be a dick

      Comment


      • Originally posted by SRK View Post
        The special assessment was approved by the Board of Directors on 19 May 2012, and mailed to owners in June 2012. It was $728, unless paid by a specific date, then it was $692. I paid $1384, in addition to the regular maintenance fees, to help finance repairs and updates to the units that were deemed necessary, in addition to the routine maintenance and updates projected and assessed.
        Wow, thanks for the explanation. I guess my question is did the owners of the Villas also get the assessment? I can't recall if I paid that, and it seems like I would have remembered it, but I can't. That's what I'm really asking.

        Comment


        • I'll go with No. or not all of us. As has been thoroughly explained, there are several divisions within The Villas. Floating, ETC, deeded

          The one common denominator is year-round amenities, which the 700# units don't have. The breakdown for their annual fees has something like $26 going to the POA, and the 600# units more like $120. I have the exact amount, but it would take effort.
          RCI Member Since 24-Aug-1989/150-plus Exchanges***THE TIMESHARE GRIM REAPER~~~Exchanging/Searching/SW Florida/MO/AR/IA/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living/Retirement****Sometimes ya just gotta be a dick

          Comment


          • Originally posted by JLB View Post
            I'll go with No. or not all of us. As has been thoroughly explained, there are several divisions within The Villas. Floating, ETC, deeded

            The one common denominator is year-round amenities, which the 700# units don't have. The breakdown for their annual fees has something like $26 going to the POA, and the 600# units more like $120. I have the exact amount, but it would take effort.
            Ok, thanks. I'm fairly certain I didn't have to pay it and I'm hoping there is not going to be an assessment on the way. I've appreciated that you've shed light on the changes, it probably would've got completely by me. I knew something was going on, but not the specifics. I'm the guy who saw the note on the fireplace but didn't ask any questions, so I'm glad SRK gave us the report.

            The exact breakdown is definitely not worth any extra time, it is interesting that there is a difference though.

            Comment


            • Well, now that I was such a PITA, and they had to do a mailing or three, look for an increase in fees.

              Thank you, thank you very much.

              (Play the Elvis leaving the building music)

              http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nUxfvPr0Gco
              RCI Member Since 24-Aug-1989/150-plus Exchanges***THE TIMESHARE GRIM REAPER~~~Exchanging/Searching/SW Florida/MO/AR/IA/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living/Retirement****Sometimes ya just gotta be a dick

              Comment


              • JLB would complain if they offered to buy back his weeks.

                Comment


                • Originally posted by tonyg View Post
                  JLB would complain if they offered to buy back his weeks.
                  You kids say the craziest things.
                  RCI Member Since 24-Aug-1989/150-plus Exchanges***THE TIMESHARE GRIM REAPER~~~Exchanging/Searching/SW Florida/MO/AR/IA/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living/Retirement****Sometimes ya just gotta be a dick

                  Comment


                  • Originally posted by tonyg View Post
                    JLB would complain if they offered to buy back his weeks.
                    LOL - It'd be interesting to hear their version of this story. Or at least a few good quotes from them... something like - "Out of all of our owners, why did THAT guy have to be the first to find out about the rule changes" !!!

                    Comment


                    • Oh, so now there are rule changes, too.

                      RCI Member Since 24-Aug-1989/150-plus Exchanges***THE TIMESHARE GRIM REAPER~~~Exchanging/Searching/SW Florida/MO/AR/IA/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living/Retirement****Sometimes ya just gotta be a dick

                      Comment


                      • Originally posted by JLB2 View Post
                        I just came back to take care of loose ends in this thread.

                        1. The entity that was going to take some of our weeks, for free, to resell them, with us paying the 2014 fees, which we did, did not.
                        True to form, when I went to check our guests in today, there was no evidence that this business had ever been there. They just folded up their table and stole away in the middle of the night.

                        A year ago today, when I went to check in our guests last year, I was still trying to get information that the HOA had not provided about the dissolution of Escapes.

                        Time flies when you're having fun.
                        RCI Member Since 24-Aug-1989/150-plus Exchanges***THE TIMESHARE GRIM REAPER~~~Exchanging/Searching/SW Florida/MO/AR/IA/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living/Retirement****Sometimes ya just gotta be a dick

                        Comment


                        • Ideally, what you want to have are qualified people serving on the board and that you have an owner base that is informed and participating so that you have everyone operating from a common information base. It’s important to emphasis that in these owner-operated resorts, the owners are in control. They elect the board members and they approve a budget. These two rights that they have enable the owners to be in control of the destiny of a resort.. . .

                          It's good to have people with communication skills.

                          . . .

                          They have to be aware of trends so they can predict in future years what’s likely to happen.

                          It also has a duty to inform the owners as to what’s going on so that the owners can make meaningful decisions with regard to the budget and also for the election of the board at the regular meetings.

                          So depending on the condition of the resort, the board members have to look at these broad issues that are going on within the industry. They have to look at whether they should consider a trust conversion? What’s the status of the resort? Can it survive on its own or should it be considering merging with some other resort? Directors want to look at the numbers of use that are going on with respect to the property and address the question of whether or not the property is too large to accommodate the use and whether some downsizing would be appropriate. Unfortunately in some dire cases where a property has not been well managed or for one reason or another is no longer popular, perhaps because of the area in which the resort is located is no longer a hot destination place, then the board should consider whether or not the resort should be dissolved and sold and whatever value remains in it distributed to the owners. These are some major issues that they do have to keep on top of to make certain that in acting in the best interest of the owners. Directors must be aware of the future possibilities that may affect the resort.

                          The problem that I’ve seen especially with legacy resorts that have experienced some distress with declining revenues, especially as a result of these timeshare relief companies that have been predators on resorts, they find themselves in the position where they have limited funds and wrestle with the question can we afford to get the advice that we need to go forward or will our membership think that the assessments are too high and will that cause a further deterioration in our delinquencies so the resort in jeopardy.

                          That’s a very difficult question. What I would say is that a board has to have the knowledge in order to make informed decisions. Without the knowledge, the board can’t direct the future course of a resort. Therefore, I think it is important to get competent advisors who can help the board evaluate the result and guide it to a set of options that will be available to the board to consider and ultimately decide where they want to take a resort. I think that boards, in order to discharge their responsibility, need to find the funds in order to get the assistance that they need to make these very important decisions. Many legacy resorts are challenged by the issues we were just talking about, declining membership, rising delinquencies, questions as to whether or not the condition of the resort is sufficient to be competitive in the current timeshare industry. In order to make the right decisions for these very important decisions, they need to have competent advice.


                          I think the board of directors should be insistent that they have a website and other means of communicating what’s going on a making certain that the owners are given the opportunity to get as much meaningful information about the resort as possible. Vice versa, I think every owner needs to understand that because of the power that the owners hold to elect members of the board and to approve a budget, that in order to do so, they need to make every effort to be informed so that they can make intelligent decisions. Owners should constantly be reminded of the importance of their attending meetings. Owners should also be reminded that the resort needs to have their participation in order to operate and encourage owners to step forward and participate on the board or serve on committees that are set up to address a specific issues on which the board may need information.

                          and more

                          http://www.gcglaw.com/resources/reso...directors.html

                          Good read from a qualified source.
                          JLB
                          Please excuse me, I'm a Dick. Not a moron just a Dick
                          Last edited by JLB; 07-13-2014, 11:27 AM.
                          RCI Member Since 24-Aug-1989/150-plus Exchanges***THE TIMESHARE GRIM REAPER~~~Exchanging/Searching/SW Florida/MO/AR/IA/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living/Retirement****Sometimes ya just gotta be a dick

                          Comment


                          • There are more SBV owners communicating on this forum than the HOA has ever facilitated.

                            2

                            RCI Member Since 24-Aug-1989/150-plus Exchanges***THE TIMESHARE GRIM REAPER~~~Exchanging/Searching/SW Florida/MO/AR/IA/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living/Retirement****Sometimes ya just gotta be a dick

                            Comment


                            • Although, as has been said, there is no owners' handbook and there never has been any mailing that spells out anything about anything regarding timeshares in StoneBridge Village, the last mailing that was sent out, after I was raked over the coals for my persistence in suggesting there was confusion among the owners, which I did because I observed confusion among the owners, gives some clues as to some of what's going on (while at the same time leaving enough unsaid to keep the waters amply muddied).

                              The letterhead lists three COAs:

                              OAKRIDGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
                              STONEBRIDGE VILLAGE CONDOMINIUM OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.
                              OAKS VACATION OWNERS ASSOCIATION, INC.

                              That letter is signed by:

                              Oakridge COA, Oaks COA, and Stonebridge Village COA
                              Board of Directors

                              That, of course, does not explain what units, or area, is governed by which COA, but it does suggest (without saying it) that there is one Board of Directors governing all three COAs. It is likely that the assumption is that each owner knows what COA they are governed by and it's nobody's business what the other two do.

                              The letter explains that FIXED and FLOAT owners who have been contacted or instructed by Festiva, Escapes Travel Choices, or any other entity, that was in error, and that none of those are contracted to perform any services for fixed and float owners.

                              In red, lower down, it says ETC (Points Owners) will still call a different number for all of their stuff, without saying who that is they would be calling. It occurs to me that that raises the question as to whether they are still governed by one of the three COAs, but, again my assumption is that that is none of my business, as has pretty much been spelled out to me.

                              Then, the back of that letter is letter-headed STONEBRIDGE MANAGEMENT LLC, showing them at 1 Oak Lane, Reeds Spring, MO 65737.

                              So, with out saying it, the inference would be that that entity is the management entity of all three COA fixed and float weeks.

                              It then lists phone numbers for various things, but no email address or website for anything. Sad, but it has become a common practice among some businesses today that they don't want a written record of their actions, statements, etc., but that only serves to raise suspicion of those who choose to operate that way.

                              The only way to correspond with the written word, is to the "Board of Directors", 1 Oak Lane, Reeds Springs, 65737.

                              it still strikes me that things are backwards here, that owners are subjects of and to, a COA and management company, rather than the other way around.
                              RCI Member Since 24-Aug-1989/150-plus Exchanges***THE TIMESHARE GRIM REAPER~~~Exchanging/Searching/SW Florida/MO/AR/IA/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living/Retirement****Sometimes ya just gotta be a dick

                              Comment


                              • I was sorting through some papers looking for something else, and I came across the 2014 maintenance fee billing, dated 11/29/13.

                                The letter that came with it says:

                                " . . . .we were awarded our 20-year Gold Crown Award from RCI. We are also a newly designated RCI Points Resort. If you are interested in more information about becoming an RCI Points Member . . . ."

                                So, as has been mentioned somewhere in this discussion, it appears there is an effort to solicit more money to do the same thing, a little bit different way, even though sales ended long ago, with many unsold weeks in at least one section.
                                RCI Member Since 24-Aug-1989/150-plus Exchanges***THE TIMESHARE GRIM REAPER~~~Exchanging/Searching/SW Florida/MO/AR/IA/Consumer Advocacy/Estate Planning/Sports/Boating/Fishing/Golf/Lake-living/Retirement****Sometimes ya just gotta be a dick

                                Comment

                                Working...
                                X