ARDA : States (Smart Forms) : Utah : Major Changes Proposed to Utah Timeshare and Camp Resort Act
The ARDA press release above talks about a new bill which has been introduced into the Utah House of Representatives which would make major changes to the current timeshare act.
Looks like it would create a uniform manner in which disclosures would have to be delivered to prospective buyers.. (Sounds good to me.. Perhaps no more hiding the required disclosures in electronic formats or buried inside the hundreds of pages of the condo docs themselves).
It also seeks to prohibit the sale of timeshare products structured as trusts, cooperatives or similar entities- which I expect would try to force developers to see a simple deeded product. Again- in my mind perhaps not a bad thing..
Currently, to my knowledge the only timeshares in the state that are sold in this manner would be the Worldmark, the Monarch Grand Vacations, the Marriott Destination Club, and perhaps the ORE products. I'd assume these existing developments would be grandfathered in, but would not be allowed to expand further in the state.
What are your thoughts on this?
With all the recent issues facing some of the non-deeded products (Destination Club failures, the Friar Tuck fiasco, Point to Point, Chateau World, and recently the news from the Pelican Club) is it just me or are traditional deeded products more stable for consumers?
The ARDA press release above talks about a new bill which has been introduced into the Utah House of Representatives which would make major changes to the current timeshare act.
Looks like it would create a uniform manner in which disclosures would have to be delivered to prospective buyers.. (Sounds good to me.. Perhaps no more hiding the required disclosures in electronic formats or buried inside the hundreds of pages of the condo docs themselves).
It also seeks to prohibit the sale of timeshare products structured as trusts, cooperatives or similar entities- which I expect would try to force developers to see a simple deeded product. Again- in my mind perhaps not a bad thing..
Currently, to my knowledge the only timeshares in the state that are sold in this manner would be the Worldmark, the Monarch Grand Vacations, the Marriott Destination Club, and perhaps the ORE products. I'd assume these existing developments would be grandfathered in, but would not be allowed to expand further in the state.
What are your thoughts on this?
With all the recent issues facing some of the non-deeded products (Destination Club failures, the Friar Tuck fiasco, Point to Point, Chateau World, and recently the news from the Pelican Club) is it just me or are traditional deeded products more stable for consumers?
Comment