Originally posted by craftemp
View Post
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Unconfigured Ad Widget
Collapse
Announcement
Collapse
No announcement yet.
Burger King to move to Canada to avoid taxes
Collapse
X
-
"You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity." Adrian Rogers
-
-
Repeat: "Other governments seem to be managing quite nicely with a lower corporate tax." They seem to be aware that more corporations paying lower tax rates equals more revenue than fewer corporations paying higher tax rates."You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity." Adrian Rogers
Comment
-
I wonder if those who are rabid about moves of this sort actually understand that the Burger King outlets in the U.S. will continue to pay taxes exactly as they have been doing. Under U.S. law, Burger King corporate has to pay U.S. taxes on what their outlets in France/Yemen/Timbuckto earn, even though those outlets are already paying taxes in France/Yemen/Timbuckto. If they move corporate headquarters to Canada, that won't be the case. Canada doesn't require Burger King to pay Canadian taxes on what their outlets in France/Yemen/Timbuckto earn."You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity." Adrian Rogers
Comment
-
Originally posted by JWC View PostProbably because BBK's headquarters is in Miami FL which is what is being moved to Canada.The legitimate object of Government is to do for a community of people whatever they need to have done but cannot do at all or cannot do so well for themselves”- Lincoln
Comment
-
Imagine the gall of relocating for the purpose of reducing taxes!!! This sets a really bad example. If Burger King can get away with this, the next thing you know even individual citizens will start to pull up stakes and relocate to areas with lower taxes.“Maybe you shouldn't dress like that.”
“This is a blouse and skirt. I don't know what you're talking about.”
“You shouldn't wear that body.”
Comment
-
They are subject to American income tax laws, but not state tax laws, and that cuts the total tax burden. For retired Americans living out of the U.S., of course, most are receiving income from the U.S. as pension funds, social security, etc., so those funds would always be subject to American tax."You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity." Adrian Rogers
Comment
-
Originally posted by Ireland's Call View PostWhy not lower the tax rate ? The USA invented DTAs and now that they are working against them they want to change the rules .The UK has the same problem ... "Britannia waives the Rules " or did.
G
Comment
-
Indeed our corporate tax rate is 12.5 percent and companies attracted here employ huge numbers of workers who of course have to pay income tax , vat etc Apple ,Microsoft ,Intel ,Merck et alia
We have had a low corporate tax rate since the 1950s and despite our banking crash we are are moving back up the ladder and are A rated by the rating agencies. All without the need to increase our tax rate
G
Comment
-
That appears to speak well for "more corporations paying a lower tax=more revenue than fewer corporations paying a higher tax."
If corporations don't want to be in the U.S., there's a problem in the U.S. If some we already have want to leave, what makes anyone think more are likely to incorporate here?"You cannot legislate the poor into prosperity by legislating the wealthy out of prosperity." Adrian Rogers
Comment
Comment