Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Contractor, owner feud over hidden cash

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Contractor, owner feud over hidden cash

    Wed Dec 12, 10:42 PM ET



    CLEVELAND - A contractor who helped discover bundles of Depression-era U.S. currency totaling $182,000 hidden behind bathroom walls said the homeowner should turn the money over to him or at least share it.

    Bob Kitts said his feud with the owner of the 83-year house, a former high school classmate, has deteriorated to the point where they speak to each other only through lawyers.

    Kitts said his lawyer has drafted a lawsuit that he hopes will force Amanda Reece to turn over the money she has kept.

    Most of the currency, issued in 1927 and 1929, is in good condition, and some of the bills are so rare that one currency appraiser valued the treasure at up to $500,000, Kitts said.

    Reece accuses Kitts of extortion.

    The fight began in May 2006 when Kitts was gutting Reece's bathroom and found a box below the medicine cabinet that contained $25,200.

    "I almost passed out," Kitts recalled. "It was the ultimate contractor fantasy."

    He called Reece, who rushed home. Together they found another steel box tied to the end of a wire nailed to a stud. Inside was more than $100,000, Kitts said. Two more boxes were filled with a mix of money and religious memorabilia.

    "It was insane," Kitts said. "She was in shock — she was a wreck."

    The bundles had "P. Dunne" written on them, a likely reference to Peter Dunne, a businessman who owned the home during the Depression.

    Kitts said he took some of the currency for an appraisal and learned that many of the $10 bills were rare 1929-series Cleveland Federal Reserve bank notes, worth about $85 each. There also were $500 bills and one $1,000 bill.

    John Chambers, an attorney for Reece, said Kitts rejected his client's offer of a 10 percent finder's fee and demanded 40 percent of the small fortune.

    Reece has no intention of backing down in the face of what she considers a shakedown, Chambers said.

    Kitts asserts he found lost money, and court rulings in Ohio establish that a "finders keepers" law applies if there's no reason to believe any owner will reappear to claim it.

    It may be up to a judge to decide, said Heidi Robertson, a professor who teaches property law at Cleveland State University.

    Kitts said it would be unfair for him to take everything.

    "For such a happy, exciting adventure, I can't believe it just went to heck like this," he said.

    ___
    Lawren
    ------------------------
    There are many wonderful places in the world, but one of my favourite places is on the back of my horse.
    - Rolf Kopfle

  • #2
    Almost makes me want to start ripping out the walls in my house. Oh wait, our house was built just 9 years ago and I don't recall hiding any money in the walls. I darn sure know my contractor didn't hide anything other than flaws in those walls.
    Our timeshare and other photo's at http://dougp26364.smugmug.com/

    Comment


    • #3
      My house back in the states was built in 1842, so it might have some potential, but that would be reduced by the major renovations in the 1890s and 1950s, when contractors may have found anything that might have been there.

      Comment


      • #4
        I don't understand how the contractor thinks he has any entitlement to the find. It was in the house of the person employing him to do the work and therefore the property of the house owner.
        Does the contractor think he has an entitlement to the land the property is on, or the property itself, because he is doing work there?
        From what we here about the litiginous world of the USA I suspect the only ones who get rich from this are the lawyers.

        Comment


        • #5
          There's a video on CNN about this--but I can't find it today.

          The contractor is basically saying, "I should get it because I was honest and I didn't steal it!" The homeowner has offered him $50,000 as a reward and he's suing her instead. Her lawyer is interviewed saying that the contractor is using an obscure law that basically applies if you find pirate treasure washed up on the beach, not money in the walls of someone's home where you have been hired to do work.

          Do you remember the guys a couple of years ago who were contractors and they said they found a bunch of old coins in the roots of a tree? But it turned out that they had found them in the walls of a barn they had been hired to renovate for the owners? They tried very hard to steal the money....

          Comment


          • #6
            Frankly, the money probably belongs to the heirs of Peter Dunne (or their heirs) according to his will or the laws of intestate succession. Publicizing it like this could mean that both litigants lose it all.

            Comment


            • #7
              Originally posted by Keitht
              From what we here about the litiginous world of the USA I suspect the only ones who get rich from this are the lawyers.
              I say that all the time!!!!

              Comment


              • #8
                Originally posted by Hoc View Post
                Frankly, the money probably belongs to the heirs of Peter Dunne (or their heirs) according to his will or the laws of intestate succession. Publicizing it like this could mean that both litigants lose it all.
                I think the guy's family SHOULD get it. You rarely see a case where it so clearly belonged to a previous owner. But (from the CNN piece) the guy lived there for many, many years--something like 50 years, with the Depression years in the middle. Can you imagine selling your father's house, the house you grew up in, and seeing that Dad had stashed thousands of dollars in the walls? I do think the fair thing would be to give it back to his family.

                Comment

                Working...
                X