Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Unconfigured Ad Widget

Collapse

Announcement

Collapse
No announcement yet.

Looks like we need a "Snopes" to investigate Snopes!!! Who knows???

Collapse
X
 
  • Filter
  • Time
  • Show
Clear All
new posts

  • Looks like we need a "Snopes" to investigate Snopes!!! Who knows???

    Looks like we need a "Snopes" to investigate Snopes!!! Who knows???


    Originally posted by email received




    SNOPES-REAL EYE OPENER!

    NOW THAT'S AMAZING!!!

    WHO KNOWS FOR SURE?

    Sounds like they could be a little weighted if this is even legit.



    Who knows anymore?

    Who watches the watchers?

    Guess we have to use "Truth or Fiction" now.

    For the past few years snopes.com: Urban Legends Reference Pages has positioned itself, or others have labeled it, as the 'tell-all final word' on any comment, claim and email. But for several years people tried to find out who exactly was behind snopes.com. Only recently did Wikipedia get to the bottom of it - kinda makes you wonder what they were hiding. Well, finally we know. It is run by a husband and wife team - that's right, no big office of investigators and researchers, no team of lawyers. It's just a mom-and-pop operation that began as a hobby.

    David and Barbara Mikkelson in the San Fernando Valley of California started the website about 13 years ago - and they have no formal background or experience in investigative research. After a few years it gained popularity believing it to be unbiased and neutral, but over the past couple of years people started asking questions who was behind it and did they have a selfish motivation?

    The reason for the questions - or skepticisms - is a result of snopes.com claiming to have the bottom line facts to certain questions or issue when in fact they have been proven wrong. Also, there were criticisms the Mikkelsons were not really investigating and getting to the 'true' bottom of various issues.

    A few months ago, when my State Farm agent Bud Gregg in Mandeville hoisted a political sign referencing Barack Obama and made a big splash across the internet, 'supposedly' the Mikkelson's claim to have researched this issue before posting their findings on snopes.com. In their statement they claimed the corporate office of State Farm pressured Gregg into taking down the sign, when in fact nothing of the sort 'ever' took place. I personally contacted David Mikkelson (and he replied back to me) thinking he would want to get to the bottom of this and I gave him Bud Gregg's contact phone numbers – and Bud was going to give him phone numbers to the big exec's at State Farm in Illinois who would have been willing to speak with him about it. He never called Bud. In fact, I learned from Bud Gregg no one from snopes.com ever contacted anyone with State Farm. Yet, snopes.com issued a statement as the 'final factual word' on the issue as if they did all their homework and got to the bottom of things - not!

    Then it has been learned the Mikkelson's are very Democratic (party) and extremely liberal. As we all now know from this presidential election, liberals have a purpose agenda to discredit anything that appears to be conservative. There has been much criticism lately over the internet with people pointing out the Mikkelson's liberalism revealing itself in their website findings. Gee, what a shock? So, I say this now to everyone who goes to snopes.com to get what they think to be the bottom line facts...' proceed with caution.' Take what it says at face value and nothing more. Use it only to lead you to their references where you can link to and read the sources for yourself. Plus, you can always Google a subject and do the research yourself. It now seems apparent that's all the Mikkelson's do. After all,

    I can personally vouch from my own experience for their 'not' fully looking into things.

    Snopes.com - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

    I have found this to be true also! Many videos of Obama I tried to verify on Snopes and they said they were False...Then they gave their Liberal slant! I have suspected some problems with snopes for some time now, but I have only caught them in half-truths. If there is any subjectivity they do an immediate full left rudder.

    Truth or TruthOrFiction.com-Is that forwarded email Truth or Fiction? Research into stories, scams, hoaxes, myths, and urban legends on the Internet a better source for verification, in my opinion.

    I have recently discovered that Snopes.com is owned by a flaming liberal and this man is in the tank for Obama. There are many things they have listed on their site as a hoax and yet you can go to Youtube yourself and find the video of Obama actually saying these things. So you see, you cannot and should not trust Snopes.com.ever for anything that remotely resembles truth! I don't even trust them to tell me if email chains are hoaxes anymore.

    A few conservative speakers on Myspace told me about snopes.com <snopes.com: Urban Legends Reference Pages, a few months ago and I took it upon myself to do a little research to find out if it was true. well, I found out for myself that it is true.

    Anyway just FYI please don't use Snopes.com anymore for fact checking and make your friends aware of their political leanings as well. Many people still think Snopes..com is neutral and they can be trusted as factual.

    We need to make sure everyone is aware that that is a hoax in itself.
    ... not enough time for all the timeshares ®

  • #2
    Fact check checks the Snopes viral email...

    Snopes.com | FactCheck.org

    Comment


    • #3
      Spence

      Shame on you. I can't believe a smart guy like you would fall for one of those lame viral e-mails.
      The legitimate object of Government is to do for a community of people whatever they need to have done but cannot do at all or cannot do so well for themselves”- Lincoln

      Comment


      • #4
        The amusing thing is Wikipedia checking on someone- that's like making Madoff the head of the SEC.

        Comment


        • #5
          Originally posted by akparsa
          Originally posted by barndweller
          Spence

          Shame on you. I can't believe a smart guy like you would fall for one of those lame viral e-mails.
          Originally posted by tonyg
          The amusing thing is Wikipedia checking on someone- that's like making Madoff the head of the SEC.
          No viruses here, I just thought it was hilarious and that's why I posted it in G&A Cafe. At least tonyg and I have agreed on something this year. I can't believe a savvy person would believe that I believed that snopes believed that factcheck believed that Annenberg believed...... just because so many people quote snopes, really.
          ... not enough time for all the timeshares ®

          Comment

          Working...
          X