Originally posted by 4ARedOctober
But the media - and the clubs - love the scrappy white guys. Put two scrappy guys on the same roster - one white and one non-white - and the white guy will get the disproportionate attention. The non-white guy will be "solid", "versatile", a "contributor". But the white guy will be "scrappy", "plays the game the right way", "always makes things happen", "brings intangibles", "is the hardest worker on the team", "has fought for everything", "has made the most of his talent".
***
DePodesta is an interesting situation (and I certainly hope Plaschke is not your source of accurate information). I have some friends who are extremely well-connected inside baseball circles. The info I get is that DePodesta's biggest failing was that he has almost zero people skills, and people skills is a critical requirement of being a GM.
When DePo came in he caused a huge drain in talent, because he was such an abrasive person. Then when he didn't get along with the press, they crucified him as well. And when he P.O'd Jamie McCourt he was done.
DePo will probably never be a GM again. He will always find employment as an analyst, which is his best calling.
Oh - and Kim Ng actually cut her teeth with the Yankees.
****
But I still believe the trend is firmly in place - the teams that have embraced numeric analysis most openly are disproportionately represented in the playoffs.
You cite the Dodgers as an example of an implosion. I'll put against that one implosion the successes of the Red Sox, Yankees, Oakland, Indians, and Diamondbacks.
Comment