I am not a big sports person, so may be asking a stupid question.
If the NFL sets a rule, isn't that an internal company type of rule? If they say 'no drugs, no drugs to cover up drug indicators' why do the courts need to be involved with that?
You may have heard of two players for the Vikings, both named Williams who took a weight loss drug which the NFL claims to cover up other drugs. NFL has suspended them for 4 games. A county court has issued a temporary stay on that and a federal court change changed that around.
While I would rather see the Williams Wall playing on Sunday, why does this get to be a court decision on what happens? It is an NFL rule (and they may have been playing with the rules which is part of the issue here) why are the courts involved in it?
If the NFL sets a rule, isn't that an internal company type of rule? If they say 'no drugs, no drugs to cover up drug indicators' why do the courts need to be involved with that?
You may have heard of two players for the Vikings, both named Williams who took a weight loss drug which the NFL claims to cover up other drugs. NFL has suspended them for 4 games. A county court has issued a temporary stay on that and a federal court change changed that around.
While I would rather see the Williams Wall playing on Sunday, why does this get to be a court decision on what happens? It is an NFL rule (and they may have been playing with the rules which is part of the issue here) why are the courts involved in it?
Comment